GEt Quote
  • Metal 3D Printing Materials: A Guide to 7 Key Alloys

    Jul 03, 2026 | ACS MATERIAL LLC

    The alloy you choose shapes almost everything about a metal 3D-printed part — its strength, weight, heat and corrosion resistance, how it is finished, and what it costs. This guide covers the seven metal families that dominate metal additive manufacturing today: stainless steel, tool and maraging steel, titanium, aluminum, cobalt-chrome, nickel superalloys, and copper. For each, it gives what the material is good at, the grades most used in laser powder bed fusion, the things to watch, and where it fits.1,2

    Quick picks. Stainless steel (316L / 17-4PH) for general-purpose, corrosion-resistant parts; maraging / tool steel (18Ni300) for hard tooling and dies; titanium (Ti-6Al-4V) for lightweight strength and biocompatibility; aluminum (AlSi10Mg) for light structural parts; cobalt-chrome (CoCrMo) for wear resistance and medical implants; nickel superalloys (Inconel 625 / 718) for high-temperature strength; and copper (CuCrZr) for thermal and electrical conductivity. Match the alloy to the part’s dominant requirement, then confirm printability and the needed heat treatment with your provider.
    Metal 3D-printed sample parts in different alloy tones including copper, titanium, aluminum, and stainless steel
    The seven metal families that dominate metal additive manufacturing, from stainless steel to copper. Representative image.

    How to choose a metal AM alloy

    Choosing an alloy for metal 3D printing means ranking the requirements that actually drive the part and matching them to a material. The main axes are mechanical properties (strength, hardness, fatigue), service temperature, corrosion resistance, weight (strength-to-density), biocompatibility, thermal and electrical conductivity, and cost.3,4 Two AM-specific factors matter just as much: printability — how readily the alloy processes without cracking or excessive defects — and the post-processing (stress relief, heat treatment, hot isostatic pressing, machining) needed to reach final properties.5,6 No single alloy wins on every axis, so the practical approach is to fix the one or two requirements that cannot be compromised, then choose from the alloys that meet them. Beyond the seven families below, more specialized alloys — including refractory metals such as tantalum — are also printable for niche high-performance uses.7

    Interactive: alloy selector

    Pick the requirement that matters most for your part to see the metal AM alloy that typically fits best, and why.

    A guide to typical first choices; the best alloy for a specific part depends on the full set of requirements and should be confirmed with your provider.

    Stainless steel (316L, 17-4PH)

    Stainless steel is the workhorse of metal AM: forgiving to print, well-characterized, and inexpensive relative to titanium or nickel alloys. 316L is an austenitic stainless prized for corrosion resistance, ductility, and weldability; it reaches high density in laser powder bed fusion and is widely used for fluid, marine, food, and general engineering parts; it is also among the most-studied alloys across other AM routes.8,9,10 17-4PH is a precipitation-hardening stainless that can be heat-treated to much higher strength while keeping good corrosion resistance, making it a common choice where strength and corrosion both matter.11 Both are natural starting points when a part does not demand the specialized properties of the other families.

    Tool & maraging steel (18Ni300)

    When a part must be hard and strong — injection-mold tooling, dies, jigs — maraging and tool steels are the go-to. Maraging steel 18Ni300 prints well and, after aging heat treatment, develops nanoscale precipitates that push tensile strength to roughly 1,900–2,100 MPa with good toughness.12,13 Its low carbon content reduces cracking risk and gives excellent dimensional stability through heat treatment, which is why it dominates 3D-printed tooling — particularly molds with conformal cooling channels that cannot be machined into a solid block.13

    Titanium (Ti-6Al-4V)

    Ti-6Al-4V is the most important titanium alloy in AM, valued for an outstanding strength-to-weight ratio, excellent corrosion resistance, and biocompatibility. Its microstructure — and therefore its strength and ductility — is highly sensitive to the rapid solidification of laser melting and to subsequent heat treatment, so parameters and post-processing are tuned carefully.14,15,16,17 As-built titanium carries high residual stress and benefits from stress relief and often hot isostatic pressing to maximize fatigue performance.18,19 It is the default for lightweight aerospace structures and for orthopedic and dental implants.

    Aluminum (AlSi10Mg)

    AlSi10Mg is the established aluminum alloy for laser powder bed fusion — essentially a casting alloy well suited to the rapid melting and solidification of AM. It offers low density with good strength, thermal conductivity, and printability, making it the choice for lightweight structural brackets, housings, and heat-management parts.20,21 Achieving low porosity and a good surface depends strongly on process parameters, and its properties respond to heat treatment; careful parameter control is needed to reach full density.22,23

    Cobalt-chrome (CoCrMo)

    Cobalt-chrome (CoCrMo) combines high hardness, excellent wear and corrosion resistance, good high-temperature strength, and biocompatibility. Medical-grade cobalt-chrome alloys are a mainstay for dental frameworks and crowns, orthopedic implants, and wear components, where hardness and corrosion resistance outlast stainless steel.24,25 Like the other alloys, its as-built microstructure and mechanical performance are refined by appropriate heat treatment.24 It is chosen when wear resistance or medical-grade biocompatibility is the priority rather than low weight.

    Nickel superalloys (Inconel 625 / 718)

    Nickel-based superalloys keep their strength where most metals fail — at high temperature. Inconel 625 offers excellent high-temperature strength, fatigue, creep, and corrosion resistance and prints with good geometrical freedom, serving hot-section aeroengine, chemical, and marine parts.26,27 Inconel 718 is one of the most-used aerospace superalloys; as-built material needs solution and double-aging heat treatment to precipitate the nanoscale phases that give it high strength and creep resistance up to around 650 °C.28,29 These alloys are also prone to scan-strategy-dependent cracking, so processing is developed with care.30 Choose them for turbine, combustion, and other high-temperature components.

    Copper (CuCrZr, pure copper)

    Copper is the material for moving heat and electricity — heat exchangers, heat sinks, inductors, and electrical components. It is also the hardest of these families to print, because copper strongly reflects the near-infrared laser and conducts heat away from the melt pool, so specialized parameters, powder treatments, or green/blue lasers are used to reach density.31,32 Pure copper maximizes conductivity, while CuCrZr is a precipitation-hardening copper alloy that trades a little conductivity for much higher strength; a suitable heat treatment can give roughly 200 HV hardness while keeping thermal conductivity around 300 W/m·K.33 Copper is chosen when thermal or electrical performance drives the design.

    Alloys compared

    A high-level comparison of the seven families. Grades and applications are typical; properties depend on parameters, heat treatment, and part design.34

    Alloy familyKey strengthsTypical gradesTypical applications
    Stainless steelCorrosion resistance, ductility, low cost, easy to print316L, 17-4PHGeneral engineering, fluid, marine, food
    Tool / maraging steelVery high hardness & strength after aging18Ni300 (1.2709)Injection molds, dies, tooling
    TitaniumStrength-to-weight, corrosion, biocompatibleTi-6Al-4VAerospace structures, implants
    AluminumLightweight, thermal, good printabilityAlSi10MgLight structural, housings, heat management
    Cobalt-chromeWear & corrosion resistance, biocompatibleCoCrMoDental, orthopedic implants, wear parts
    Nickel superalloyHigh-temperature strength & creep resistanceInconel 625, 718Turbine, combustion, hot-section parts
    CopperThermal & electrical conductivityPure Cu, CuCrZrHeat exchangers, heat sinks, inductors

    Post-processing by alloy

    Almost every metal AM part needs some post-processing, and the recipe depends on the alloy:

    • Stress relief on the build plate is near-universal for laser powder bed fusion, especially for high-stress alloys such as titanium and nickel superalloys, to prevent distortion when the part is removed.18
    • Aging / precipitation heat treatment is what unlocks strength in 17-4PH, maraging steel, nickel superalloys, and CuCrZr — the as-built part is comparatively soft until the strengthening phases are precipitated.12,29,33
    • Hot isostatic pressing (HIP) closes internal porosity and improves fatigue life, and is common for critical titanium and nickel parts.19
    • Machining of critical faces and fits follows, because as-built surfaces are rougher than machined ones across all alloys.16

    The bigger picture

    There is no single “best” metal for 3D printing — only the best fit for a given part. Rank the requirements that cannot be compromised, choose from the alloys that meet them, and plan the heat treatment and finishing that turn an as-built part into a functional one.1

    ACS Material’s metal 3D printing service works across these alloy families on laser powder bed fusion, including the stress relief, aging, HIP, and machining each material needs. If you are still weighing processes, see our comparison of SLM vs DMLS vs binder jetting, our guide to metal 3D printing precision and tolerance, and how we handle large-format metal parts; we also supply the XDM metal 3D printers. Tell us your part’s requirements and we will recommend the alloy and process.

    FAQs

    What metals can be 3D printed?

    The most common metal AM materials are stainless steels (316L, 17-4PH), tool and maraging steels (18Ni300), titanium (Ti-6Al-4V), aluminum (AlSi10Mg), cobalt-chrome (CoCrMo), nickel superalloys (Inconel 625 and 718), and copper (pure copper and CuCrZr). Many other alloys are printable, but these seven families cover the large majority of industrial parts.

    Which metal is strongest for 3D printing?

    It depends on what “strongest” means. For sheer hardness and tensile strength, aged maraging steel is among the highest (roughly 1,900–2,100 MPa). For strength at high temperature, nickel superalloys like Inconel lead. For strength relative to weight, titanium Ti-6Al-4V is usually the best choice.

    What is the best metal for 3D-printed implants?

    Titanium Ti-6Al-4V and cobalt-chrome (CoCrMo) are the leading choices for medical and dental parts because both are biocompatible and corrosion-resistant. Titanium is favored for its strength-to-weight ratio and bone-friendly properties; cobalt-chrome is favored where hardness and wear resistance matter, such as dental frameworks and bearing surfaces.

    Which metal is best for heat and electrical conductivity?

    Copper. Pure copper offers the highest thermal and electrical conductivity, while CuCrZr trades a little conductivity for much higher strength. Copper is harder to print than other metals because it reflects the laser and conducts heat away from the melt pool, so it needs specialized parameters or laser sources.

    Do 3D-printed metal parts need heat treatment?

    Usually. Stress relief is near-universal to prevent distortion, and several alloys — 17-4PH, maraging steel, nickel superalloys, and CuCrZr — only reach their full strength after an aging heat treatment that precipitates strengthening phases. Critical titanium and nickel parts often also receive hot isostatic pressing to close porosity.

    Which metal 3D printing material is cheapest?

    Stainless steel is generally the most economical common metal AM material and is also one of the easiest to print, which is why it is a frequent default. Titanium, nickel superalloys, and copper cost more per kilogram and can be more demanding to process.

    References

    1 DebRoy T, Wei HL, Zuback JS, Mukherjee T, Elmer JW, Milewski JO, et al. Additive manufacturing of metallic components — Process, structure and properties. Prog Mater Sci. 2018;92:112–224. doi:10.1016/j.pmatsci.2017.10.001
    2 Frazier WE. Metal additive manufacturing: a review. J Mater Eng Perform. 2014;23:1917–1928. doi:10.1007/s11665-014-0958-z
    3 Lewandowski JJ, Seifi M. Metal additive manufacturing: a review of mechanical properties. Annu Rev Mater Res. 2016;46:151–186. doi:10.1146/annurev-matsci-070115-032024
    4 Armstrong M, Mehrabi H, Naveed N. An overview of modern metal additive manufacturing technology. J Manuf Process. 2022;84:1001–1029. doi:10.1016/j.jmapro.2022.10.060
    5 Gu DD, Meiners W, Wissenbach K, Poprawe R. Laser additive manufacturing of metallic components: materials, processes and mechanisms. Int Mater Rev. 2012;57(3):133–164. doi:10.1179/1743280411Y.0000000014
    6 King WE, Anderson AT, Ferencz RM, Hodge NE, Kamath C, Khairallah SA, et al. Laser powder bed fusion additive manufacturing of metals; physics, computational, and materials challenges. Appl Phys Rev. 2015;2(4):041304. doi:10.1063/1.4937809
    7 Mohsan AUH, Wei D. Advancements in additive manufacturing of tantalum via the laser powder bed fusion (PBF-LB/M): a comprehensive review. Materials. 2023;16(19):6419. doi:10.3390/ma16196419
    8 Larimian T, Kannan M, Grzesiak D, AlMangour B, Borkar T. Effect of energy density and scanning strategy on densification, microstructure and mechanical properties of 316L stainless steel processed via selective laser melting. Mater Sci Eng A. 2020;770:138455. doi:10.1016/j.msea.2019.138455
    9 Maksimkin IP, Yukhimchuk AA, Malkov IL, Boitsov IE, Musyaev RK, Buchirin AV, et al. Effect of hydrogen on the structure and mechanical properties of 316L steel and Inconel 718 alloy processed by selective laser melting. Materials. 2022;15(14):4806. doi:10.3390/ma15144806
    10 Mao Y, Cai C, Zhang J, Heng Y, Feng K, Cai D, Wei Q. Effect of sintering temperature on binder jetting additively manufactured stainless steel 316L: densification, microstructure evolution and mechanical properties. J Mater Res Technol. 2023;22:2720–2735. doi:10.1016/j.jmrt.2022.12.096
    11 LeBrun T, Nakamoto T, Horikawa K, Kobayashi H. Effect of retained austenite on subsequent thermal processing and resultant mechanical properties of selective laser melted 17-4 PH stainless steel. Mater Des. 2015;81:44–53. doi:10.1016/j.matdes.2015.05.026
    12 No J, et al. Mechanical properties and microstructure of laser powder bed fusion-processed 18Ni300 maraging steel according to direct aging treatment conditions. Steel Res Int. 2025;96:2400348. doi:10.1002/srin.202400348
    13 Sun Y, et al. Heat treatment effects and variant selection in multi-material laser powder bed fusion of FeNi- and CoCr-based alloys (18Ni300 maraging steel – CoCrMo). Virtual Phys Prototyp. 2024;19(1):e2372629. doi:10.1080/17452759.2024.2372629
    14 Thijs L, Verhaeghe F, Craeghs T, Van Humbeeck J, Kruth JP. A study of the microstructural evolution during selective laser melting of Ti–6Al–4V. Acta Mater. 2010;58(9):3303–3312. doi:10.1016/j.actamat.2010.02.004
    15 Song B, Dong S, Zhang B, Liao H, Coddet C. Effects of processing parameters on microstructure and mechanical property of selective laser melted Ti6Al4V. Mater Des. 2012;35:120–125. doi:10.1016/j.matdes.2011.09.051
    16 Khorasani AM, Gibson I, Awan US, Ghaderi A. The effect of SLM process parameters on density, hardness, tensile strength and surface quality of Ti-6Al-4V. Addit Manuf. 2019;25:176–186. doi:10.1016/j.addma.2018.09.002
    17 Yang J, Han J, Yu H, Yin J, Gao M, Wang Z, Zeng X. Role of molten pool mode on formability, microstructure and mechanical properties of selective laser melted Ti-6Al-4V alloy. Mater Des. 2016;110:558–570. doi:10.1016/j.matdes.2016.08.036
    18 Wang D, Wang H, Chen X, Liu Y, Lu D, Liu X, et al. Densification, tailored microstructure, and mechanical properties of selective laser melted Ti–6Al–4V alloy via annealing heat treatment. Micromachines. 2022;13(2):331. doi:10.3390/mi13020331
    19 Qiu C, Adkins NJE, Attallah MM. Microstructure and tensile properties of selectively laser-melted and of HIPed laser-melted Ti–6Al–4V. Mater Sci Eng A. 2013;578:230–239. doi:10.1016/j.msea.2013.04.099
    20 Bai S, Perevoshchikova N, Sha Y, Wu X. The effects of selective laser melting process parameters on relative density of the AlSi10Mg parts and suitable procedures of the Archimedes method. Appl Sci. 2019;9(3):583. doi:10.3390/app9030583
    21 Maamoun AH, Xue YF, Elbestawi MA, Veldhuis SC. Effect of selective laser melting process parameters on the quality of Al alloy parts: powder characterization, density, surface roughness, and dimensional accuracy. Materials. 2018;11(12):2343. doi:10.3390/ma11122343
    22 Aboulkhair NT, Everitt NM, Ashcroft I, Tuck C. Reducing porosity in AlSi10Mg parts processed by selective laser melting. Addit Manuf. 2014;1–4:77–86. doi:10.1016/j.addma.2014.08.001
    23 Majeed A, Ahmed A, Salam A, Sheikh MZ. Surface quality improvement by parameters analysis, optimization and heat treatment of AlSi10Mg parts manufactured by SLM additive manufacturing. Int J Lightweight Mater Manuf. 2019;2(4):288–295. doi:10.1016/j.ijlmm.2019.08.001
    24 Sun Y, et al. Heat treatment effects and variant selection in multi-material laser powder bed fusion of FeNi- and CoCr-based alloys. Virtual Phys Prototyp. 2024;19(1):e2372629. doi:10.1080/17452759.2024.2372629
    25 Ramteke, et al. Engineering mechanical and bio-tribological performance of laser powder bed fusion CoCrMo via postprocessing heat treatment. Adv Eng Mater. 2026. doi:10.1002/adem.70770
    26 Nguyen QB, Nai MLS, Zhu Z, Sun CN, Wei J, Zhou W. Characteristics of Inconel 625 (nickel-based alloy) fabricated by laser powder bed fusion: a review. Appl Sci. 2020;10(1):81. doi:10.3390/app10010081
    27 Jia Q, Gu D. Selective laser melting additive manufacturing of Inconel 718 superalloy parts: densification, microstructure and properties. J Alloys Compd. 2014;585:713–721. doi:10.1016/j.jallcom.2013.09.171
    28 Li N, Wang C, Li C. Microstructures and high-temperature mechanical properties of Inconel 718 superalloy fabricated via laser powder bed fusion. Materials. 2024;17(15):3735. doi:10.3390/ma17153735
    29 Strößner J, Terock M, Glatzel U. Mechanical and microstructural investigation of nickel-based superalloy IN718 manufactured by selective laser melting (SLM). Adv Eng Mater. 2015;17(8):1099–1105. doi:10.1002/adem.201500158
    30 Carter LN, Martin C, Withers PJ, Attallah MM. The influence of the laser scan strategy on grain structure and cracking behaviour in SLM powder-bed fabricated nickel superalloy. J Alloys Compd. 2014;615:338–347. doi:10.1016/j.jallcom.2014.06.172
    31 Qu S, Wang L, Ding J, Lu Y, Song X. Influence of heat treatment on the microstructure and mechanical properties of pure copper components fabricated via micro-laser powder bed fusion. Materials. 2024;17(24):6270. doi:10.3390/ma17246270
    32 Hori E, Sato Y, Shibata T, Tojo K, Tsukamoto M. Development of an SLM process using a 200 W blue diode laser for pure copper additive manufacturing of high-density structure. J Laser Appl. 2021;33(1):012008. doi:10.2351/7.0000311
    33 Wegener T, Koopmann J, Richter J, Krooß P, Niendorf T. CuCrZr processed by laser powder bed fusion — processability and influence of heat treatment on electrical conductivity, microstructure and mechanical properties. Fatigue Fract Eng Mater Struct. 2021;44(9):2570–2590. doi:10.1111/ffe.13527
    34 Chowdhury S, Yadaiah N, Prakash C, Ramakrishna S, Dixit S, Gupta LR, Buddhi D. Laser powder bed fusion: a state-of-the-art review of the technology, materials, properties & defects, and numerical modeling. J Mater Res Technol. 2022;20:2109–2172. doi:10.1016/j.jmrt.2022.07.121

    This article is provided by ACS Material LLC for educational purposes and describes common metal 3D printing (metal additive manufacturing) alloys, including stainless steel, tool and maraging steel, titanium, aluminum, cobalt-chrome, nickel superalloys, and copper. Grade designations, mechanical-property figures (such as tensile strength, hardness, and conductivity), service temperatures, and application examples are typical values from the referenced studies and general material characteristics; the properties achievable for any specific part depend on the alloy grade, machine, process parameters, orientation, and post-processing, and must be confirmed for your application. Consult product datasheets and safety data sheets for grade-specific specifications and handling guidance. The interactive alloy selector is a schematic teaching tool based on typical first-choice materials, not a substitute for engineering material selection.