GEt Quote

Graphene Nanoplatelets (2-10nm)

As low as $115.00 $0.00
In stock
SKU# 90

Thickness: 2-10 nm; True Density: 2.3g/cm3

Product Detail

ACS Material Graphene Nanoplatelets (2–10 nm) are short stacks of multi-layer graphene with a platelet morphology and a high aspect ratio — each particle is only 2–10 nm thick (roughly 6–30 graphene layers) yet 2–7 µm wide. This flat, high-surface geometry makes them easy to disperse and to chemically modify, and lets them form conductive, thermally conductive networks in plastics, polymers, rubbers, and other composite matrices at low loading. CAS No. 7782-42-5.

Graphene nanoplatelets are nanoscale particles of graphite: stacks of graphene sheets thin enough that the material behaves very differently from bulk graphite while remaining far more robust and affordable than single-layer graphene. Under a microscope a platelet still looks graphitic; the key difference is that the stack is only a few nanometers tall, so a large fraction of the carbon sits at or near a surface. That high specific surface area, combined with the platelets’ large width-to-thickness ratio, is what lets them bridge fillers and build percolating conductive pathways inside a host matrix.

Added to composites — with PPO, POM, PPS, PC, ABS, PP, PE, PS, nylon, rubbers, and many other resins — graphene nanoplatelets can raise electrical and thermal conductivity, improve barrier properties, and increase surface toughness, stiffness, and wear and corrosion resistance. ACS Material supplies the 2–10 nm grade in 50 g, 500 g, and 1 kg packages; industrial quantities are available on request. All of our nanomaterials are produced by current methods and held to rigorous standards for purity and consistency.

Types of graphene nanoplatelets

Product No.Product nameThicknessDiameterPackage
GNNP0051Graphene Nanoplatelets (2–10 nm thick)2–10 nm2–7 µm50 g
GNNP0052Graphene Nanoplatelets (2–10 nm thick)2–10 nm2–7 µm500 g
GNNP0031Graphene Nanoplatelets (2–10 nm thick)2–10 nm2–7 µm1 kg
GNNP01A5Graphene Nanoplatelets (1–2 nm thick)1–2 nm2–3 µm500 mg
GNNP0201Graphene Nanoplatelets (1–5 nm thick)1–5 nm~5 µm1 g
GNNP0205Graphene Nanoplatelets (1–5 nm thick)1–5 nm~5 µm5 g
GNNP0211Graphene Nanoplatelets (1–5 nm thick)1–5 nm~5 µm10 g

Email or call ACS Material for pricing and availability of industrial quantities. ACS Material also offers Fluorinated Graphene Nanoplatelets.

How thickness shapes performance

Thickness is the single most useful number on this page. Thinner stacks expose more graphene surface per gram and form conductive networks at lower loading; thicker stacks are easier to handle and disperse and are often more cost-effective for bulk mechanical reinforcement. The 2–10 nm grade sits in a practical middle ground. Use the interactive tool below to see how layer count, specific surface area, and typical performance trade off — and where the 2–10 nm product lands relative to our thinner 1–2 nm and 1–5 nm grades.

Preparation method

Interlayer cleavage method. The platelets retain the layered structure of a graphite crystal, so the product is essentially few-nanometer-tall graphite with a very small stack height.

Specifications

AppearanceBlack / grey powder
Diameter (lateral size)2–7 µm
Thickness2–10 nm
Specific surface area20–40 m²/g
Electrical conductivity800–1100 S/cm
Carbon content>99%
Apparent (bulk) density0.06–0.09 g/mL
True density2.3 g/cm³
Water content<2 wt%
Residual impurities<1 wt%
Powder particle-size distributionD10 = 13.56 µm; D50 = 48.93 µm; D90 = 122.2 µm

The particle-size distribution above is measured by laser diffraction on the dry powder and reflects loosely held agglomerates of platelets, not the size of an individual sheet; the lateral size of a single platelet is 2–7 µm. Agglomerates can partially break down during compounding and dispersion, depending on shear, formulation, and surface treatment. Specific surface area is obtained from the BET method. Values are typical and may vary lot to lot — consult the SDS and TDS for the specification of a given lot.

Typical TEM image of ACS Material graphene nanoplatelets (2-10 nm), showing thin few-layer graphite platelets with a high width-to-thickness aspect ratio
Typical TEM image (1) of ACS Material Graphene Nanoplatelets (2–10 nm).
Typical TEM image of ACS Material graphene nanoplatelets (2-10 nm) at higher magnification, showing stacked graphene layers and platelet edges
Typical TEM image (2) of ACS Material Graphene Nanoplatelets (2–10 nm).

Application fields

  • Conductive & antistatic plastics and conductive rubbers
  • Thermal management — thermally conductive plastics and polymer composites, thermal interface materials
  • High-temperature lubricating materials
  • High-performance additive for PPO, POM, PPS, PC, ABS, PP, PE, PS, nylon, and rubbers
  • Mechanical reinforcement — improved tensile strength, stiffness, corrosion and abrasion resistance
  • Energy & electrochemistry — electrode and catalyst-support research, sensors

As a rule of thumb, typical loadings are about 2–6 wt% for mechanical-property modification and 2–8 wt% for conductivity modification. Graphene nanoplatelets (2–10 nm) consist of stacks of multi-layer graphene sheets in a platelet morphology with a high width-to-thickness aspect ratio; their layered structure is the same as that of a graphite crystal.

Application instructions

Mix the graphene nanoplatelets with the target polymer using a two-roll mill, Banbury mixer, twin-screw extruder, or another mixer common in the plastics industry. For better dispersion of the powder in the polymer matrix, a surface modifier — such as a silane, titanate, or aluminate coupling agent — is recommended before mixing the powder with the resin.

Note: the effectiveness of modification depends strongly on the type and amount of surface modifier used. We are glad to discuss what works best for your application — please call (US) 866-227-0656.

Related ACS Material products

Graphene Nanoplatelets (1–2 nm)

The thinnest grade, ~3–6 layers, for maximum surface area and conductivity at low loading.

Graphene Nanoplatelets (1–5 nm)

An intermediate grade bridging the 1–2 nm and 2–10 nm products.

Fluorinated Graphene Nanoplatelets

Fluorine-functionalized platelets for lubrication, dielectrics, and tailored surface chemistry.

All Graphene Nanoplatelets

Browse the full nanoplatelet range and the wider ACS Material graphene series.

Frequently asked questions

How many graphene layers is a 2–10 nm platelet?
Graphene layers are spaced about 0.34 nm apart, so a 2–10 nm stack corresponds to roughly 6–30 layers. This is the “multi-layer graphene / nanoplatelet” regime — thicker than single- or few-layer graphene, but far thinner than ordinary graphite flakes.
What is the thermal stability of graphene nanoplatelets at ambient pressure?
They are very stable and will not oxidize appreciably below about 600 °C in air.
Does this product contain phosphorus or sulfate?
There is no sulfate. A small amount of phosphorus may be present from the raw materials; its exact content has not been quantified.
Why is the measured particle size (D50 ~49 µm) larger than the 2–7 µm diameter?
The 2–7 µm figure is the lateral size of an individual platelet. The D10/D50/D90 values come from laser-diffraction analysis of the dry powder, which measures loosely bound agglomerates of many platelets. These agglomerates break apart during compounding and dispersion, so the effective filler size in a finished composite is much smaller.
How is the specific surface area determined?
It is calculated using the BET (Brunauer–Emmett–Teller) method from gas-adsorption data.
How much should I add to my composite?
Typical starting points are about 2–6 wt% for mechanical reinforcement and 2–8 wt% for electrical conductivity, optimized with a coupling agent. The best loading depends on your matrix and target property — contact us to discuss.

Research citations of ACS Material products

Selected peer-reviewed research using ACS Material graphene nanoplatelets or related graphene/graphite nanoplatelet materials, prioritizing higher-impact journals. A full citation list is available on request.

1Wang, X.; et al. Three-dimensional strutted graphene grown by substrate-free sugar blowing for high-power-density supercapacitors. Nat. Commun. 2013, 4, 2905. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms3905
2Karimi, S.; Ghasemi, I.; Abbassi-Sourki, F. A study on the crystallization kinetics of PLLA in the presence of graphene oxide and PEG-grafted graphene oxide. Composites Part B: Eng. 2019, 158, 302–310. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.10.004
3Negro, E.; et al. Toward Pt-free anion-exchange membrane fuel cells: Fe–Sn carbon nitride–graphene core–shell electrocatalysts for the oxygen reduction reaction. Chem. Mater. 2018, 30 (8), 2651–2659. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemmater.7b05323
4Yoo, E.; Zhou, H. Carbon cathodes in rechargeable lithium-oxygen batteries based on double-lithium-salt electrolytes. ChemSusChem 2016, 9 (11), 1249–1254. https://doi.org/10.1002/cssc.201600177
5Yehia, H. M.; Nouh, F.; El-Kady, O. Effect of graphene nano-sheets content and sintering time on the microstructure, coefficient of thermal expansion, and mechanical properties of (Cu/WC–TiC-Co) nano-composites. J. Alloys Compd. 2018, 764, 36–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2018.06.040
6Nieto, A.; et al. Graphene reinforced metal and ceramic matrix composites: a review. Int. Mater. Rev. 2016, 62 (5), 241–302. https://doi.org/10.1080/09506608.2016.1219481
7Zhang, G.; et al. Facile synthesis of graphene nanoplate-supported porous Pt–Cu alloys with high electrocatalytic properties for methanol oxidation. J. Mater. Chem. A 2016, 4 (9), 3316–3323. https://doi.org/10.1039/c5ta09937d
8Zhang, G.; et al. Small-sized and highly dispersed Pt nanoparticles on graphite nanoplatelets as an effective catalyst for methanol oxidation. Nanoscale 2015, 7 (22), 10170–10177. https://doi.org/10.1039/c5nr01882j
9Alam, F.; et al. Electrical, mechanical and thermal properties of graphene nanoplatelets reinforced UHMWPE nanocomposites. Mater. Sci. Eng. B 2019, 241, 82–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mseb.2019.02.011
10Gupta, T. K.; et al. Self-sensing and mechanical performance of CNT/GNP/UHMWPE biocompatible nanocomposites. J. Mater. Sci. 2018, 53 (11), 7939–7952. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-018-2072-3
11Chen, J.; Han, J. A combination of graphene and graphene nanoplatelets: an effective way to improve thermal conductivity for polymers. Results Phys. 2019, 15, 102803. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rinp.2019.102803
12Xu, P.; et al. Load transfer and mechanical properties of chemically reduced graphene reinforcements in polymer composites. Nanotechnology 2012, 23 (50), 505713. https://doi.org/10.1088/0957-4484/23/50/505713
13Li, X.; et al. Forced assembly by multilayer coextrusion to create oriented graphene reinforced polymer nanocomposites. Polymer 2014, 55 (1), 248–257. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymer.2013.11.025
14Li, M.; et al. Fabrication of graphene nanoplatelets-supported SiOx-disordered carbon composite and its application in lithium-ion batteries. J. Power Sources 2015, 293, 976–982. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2015.06.019
15Dai, S.; et al. Biothiol-mediated synthesis of Pt nanoparticles on graphene nanoplates and their application in methanol electrooxidation. J. Mater. Sci. 2018, 53 (1), 423–434. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-017-1508-5
16Rashed, A. E.; El-Moneim, A. A. Two steps synthesis approach of MnO2/graphene nanoplates/graphite composite electrode for supercapacitor application. Mater. Today Energy 2017, 3, 24–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtener.2017.02.004
17Xia, G.; et al. Highly uniform platinum nanoparticles supported on graphite nanoplatelets as a catalyst for proton exchange membrane fuel cells. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2014, 39 (28). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2013.08.033
18Zhang, X.; et al. Preparation and characterization of Pt nanoparticles supported on modified graphite nanoplatelet using solution blending method. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2013, 38 (21), 8909–8913. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2013.05.038
19Köckritz, T.; et al. Integration of carbon allotropes into polydimethylsiloxane to control the electrical conductivity. Int. J. Adhes. Adhes. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2017.12.001
20Wehnert, F.; et al. Design of multifunctional adhesives by the use of carbon nanoparticles. J. Adhes. Sci. Technol. 2015, 29 (17), 1849–1859. https://doi.org/10.1080/01694243.2015.1014536
21Strankowski, M.; et al. Morphology, mechanical and thermal properties of thermoplastic polyurethane containing reduced graphene oxide and graphene nanoplatelets. Materials 2018, 11 (1), 82. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma11010082
22Piszczyk, Ł.; et al. Elastic polyurethane foams containing graphene nanoplatelets. Adv. Polym. Technol. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1002/adv.21819
23Kumar, P.; et al. Strength of Mg–3%Al alloy in presence of graphene nanoplatelets as reinforcement. Mater. Sci. Technol. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1080/02670836.2018.1424380
24Luan, X.; Wang, Y. Thermal annealing and graphene modification of exfoliated hydrogen titanate nanosheets for enhanced lithium-ion intercalation properties. J. Mater. Sci. Technol. 2014, 30 (9), 839–846. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmst.2014.07.003
25Filippidou, M. K.; et al. A flexible strain sensor made of graphene nanoplatelets/polydimethylsiloxane nanocomposite. Microelectron. Eng. 2015, 142, 7–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mee.2015.06.007
26Butmee, P.; et al. A direct and sensitive electrochemical sensing platform based on ionic liquid functionalized graphene nanoplatelets for the detection of bisphenol A. J. Electroanal. Chem. 2019, 833, 370–379. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jelechem.2018.12.018
27Konecka, K.; et al. Development and first application of the edge plane pyrolytic graphite electrode modified with graphene nanoplatelets for highly sensitive voltammetric determination of oxolinic acid. J. Electroanal. Chem. 2018, 826, 76–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jelechem.2018.08.024
28Boonkaew, S.; et al. An origami paper-based electrochemical immunoassay for the C-reactive protein using a screen-printed carbon electrode modified with graphene and gold nanoparticles. Microchim. Acta 2019, 186 (3), 153. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00604-019-3245-8
29Zrinski, I.; et al. Evaluation of phenolic antioxidant capacity in beverages based on laccase immobilized on screen-printed carbon electrode modified with graphene nanoplatelets and gold nanoparticles. Microchem. J. 2020, 152, 104282. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.microc.2019.104282
30El-Kady, O.; Yehia, H. M.; Nouh, F. Preparation and characterization of Cu/(WC-TiC-Co)/graphene nano-composites as a suitable material for heat sink by powder metallurgy method. Int. J. Refract. Met. Hard Mater. 2019, 79, 108–114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrmhm.2018.11.007
31Swiderska-Mocek, A.; Rudnicka, E. Lithium–sulphur battery with activated carbon cloth-sulphur cathode and ionic liquid as electrolyte. J. Power Sources 2015, 273, 162–167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.09.020
32Negro, E.; et al. Graphene-supported Au-Ni carbon nitride electrocatalysts for the ORR in alkaline environment. ECS Trans. 2016, 72 (29), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1149/07229.0001ecst

Disclaimer: ACS Material LLC believes the information on this site is accurate and represents the best information currently available to us, but makes no representations or warranties, express or implied, regarding the suitability of the material for any purpose or the accuracy of the information. ACS Material will not be responsible for damages resulting from use of or reliance upon this information.