GEt Quote
  • Small vs Large-Tonnage Laboratory Presses: How Much Force Do You Need?

    Oct 10, 2026 | ACS MATERIAL LLC

    “How many tons do I need?” has no single answer, because tons are force and a method specifies pressure. The same 10 t is about 740 MPa on a 13 mm die and about 80 MPa on a 40 mm die. This guide works out the force from the die and the pressure, collects the pressures that published methods use, and explains why a press much larger than the job can be a poor choice: at the low end of its range the readout steps are coarse, some models have a printed lower limit, and the frame is heavier and larger. A sizing tool checks every PressPro™ pellet press for powder, KBr or XRF work against your range.

    Rated force: the maximum force of the press, in tonnes-force (t). Pressure on the sample: force divided by the loaded area, in megapascals (MPa). Lower limit: the lowest force printed for an automatic or electric model’s range. Readout step: the smallest change the gauge or display shows, which on the sample is a pressure step that grows as the die gets smaller.

    In one paragraph: multiply the pressure your method needs by the area of your die to get the force, at both the lowest and the highest pressure you will use. Choose a frame whose rating covers the highest force and whose lower limit and readout step suit the lowest. Published pressures run from a few megapascals for a fiber composite consolidated in a heated mold to several hundred for KBr discs and battery electrolytes, and 1760 MPa in one high-pressure XRF method, so a lab that presses 7 mm micro pellets and one that presses 40 mm XRF pellets need very different frames. Precise force matters most where a property changes steeply with pressure. Weight, footprint and power rise with tonnage, and so do the guards.

    A compact two-column laboratory pellet press beside a large automatic powder press with a guard door on a laboratory bench
    A larger frame is not a more capable press for every job. The die and the pressure decide the force; the frame has to cover both ends of that range.

    The tonnage-to-MPa calculator converts force, gauge reading and pressure for every PressPro™ frame, and the comparison of manual, electric and automatic presses explains what each kind of press controls. This page is about choosing the size of the frame.

    1.  Force comes from pressure and area

    force (t) = pressure (MPa) × loaded area (mm²) ÷ 9800

    The loaded area is the bore of a die, or the footprint of the sample or frame mold on a platen press. Area grows with the square of the diameter, so force does too: a 40 mm die needs about 33 times the force of a 7 mm die for the same pressure.

    Die bore50 MPa100 MPa200 MPa400 MPa800 MPa
    7 mm0.20 t0.39 t0.79 t1.57 t3.14 t
    13 mm0.68 t1.35 t2.71 t5.42 t10.8 t
    20 mm1.60 t3.21 t6.41 t12.8 t25.6 t
    32 mm4.10 t8.21 t16.4 t32.8 t65.7 t
    40 mm6.41 t12.8 t25.6 t51.3 t103 t

    Calculated here. For steel dies, the PressPro™ die pressure chart gives normal use below 800 MPa, 800 to 1200 MPa as overload and above 1200 MPa as severe overload. The 800 MPa column is shown for scale, not as a target.

    2.  What pressure does your method need?

    The pressure comes from the method, not from the press. The studies below show how wide the range is. They are examples of published practice, not recommendations.

    WorkReported conditionPressure on the sample
    KBr discs for FTIR, 13 mm10 tons for about 1 min1About 740 MPa
    KBr micro pellet, 7 mm1.7 tons for 3 min2About 430 MPa
    XRF pressed powder, 40 mm100 kN3About 80 MPa
    XRF pressed powder, biological samplesConventional pellets compared with high-pressure pellets4220 to 440, and 1760 MPa
    Ceramic green bodiesZircon bars in a double-action die5; an oxide electrolyte before sintering645 to 180 MPa; 100 MPa
    Pharmaceutical tablets9 to 14 mm punches7; paracetamol and cellulose tablets8About 50 to 300 MPa; 80 to 320 MPa
    Sulfide electrolyte and electrode pellets21 laboratories building cells from the same materials, each with its own method: positive electrodes, and separators9; an electrolyte pellet in a 13 mm die10250 to 520 MPa, and up to 590 MPa; 370 MPa
    3D-printed carbon-fiber/PA12 composite, consolidated in a heated mold200 to 210 °C112 to 10 MPa

    Pressures calculated here from force and area where the source gives force. The two KBr sources print tons; we take them as tonnes-force. The 1760 MPa pellets are in the severe-overload band (above 1200 MPa) of the PressPro™ die pressure chart for steel dies. Compression molding of thermoplastic test specimens, plaques and sheets is the subject of ASTM D4703 and ISO 293; ISO 293 does not apply to reinforced thermoplastics, such as the composite in the last row.12,13

    Put the two together and the spread in force is large. About 10 t on a 13 mm KBr die and on a 40 mm XRF die at 80 MPa; about 5 t for the 13 mm electrolyte pellet at 370 MPa; about 26 t for a 40 mm pellet at 200 MPa; about 1.6 t for a 7 mm pellet at 400 MPa; and about 5 t for a 100 × 100 mm plate at 5 MPa.

    3.  The low end of a big press

    A frame rated far above the job spends its working life at the bottom of its range. Three things work against that.

    Readout steps

    Every gauge and display has a smallest step, and on the sample that step is a pressure, larger on small dies. On PressPro™ presses:

    • The pointer gauges of the manual powder frames (two-column, four-column and protective) have a resolution of 1 MPa of oil pressure. On the 60 T frame one division is 1.76 t, which on a 7 mm die is about 450 MPa, more than many methods need in total. On the 15 T frame it is 0.5 t, about 130 MPa on the same die.
    • The digital gauges of the same manual powder frames read to 0.01 t, about 2.5 MPa on a 7 mm die.
    • On the electric powder presses, the automatic powder presses from 10 to 100 T, the electric and automatic infrared presses and the automatic XRF presses, the screen reads force to 0.1 t. That is about 25 MPa on a 7 mm die and under 1 MPa on a 40 mm die.

    The reading step of the large-tonnage automatic presses, of the manual infrared and XRF presses and of the mini infrared press is not covered here.

    Printed lower limits

    The automatic and electric models print the lowest force of their range. The automatic powder presses start at 0.1 t on the 10 T model and at 1 t on the 100 T model; the large-tonnage automatic presses start at 1 t. One tonne on a 7 mm die is already about 255 MPa, so a 7 mm method at 100 MPa cannot be run on those frames at all. The manual frames have no printed lower limit.

    Error at the low end of a range

    Bourdon-tube gauges are covered by EN 837-1, and dial and digital gauges by ASME B40.100, whose contents list a table of accuracy grades.14,15 The accuracy class of the PressPro™ gauges is not covered here. In one worked calibration, a class 1.0 Bourdon gauge with a range up to 1.6 MPa had a maximum permissible error of ±0.016 MPa, calculated from its class and applied across its scale.16 By our arithmetic that is about 1 % of a reading near the top and about 8 % of a reading of 0.2 MPa.

    Related effects appear in metrology and hydraulics work:

    • In the European guide to force-measurement uncertainty, the relative contribution of the indicator’s resolution grows as the force falls, and transfer standards are recommended to be used above 40 % of their capacity.17 The force-proving instruments behind such calibrations are classified under ISO 376.18
    • A pressure balance built on a force transducer at a national standards laboratory lost accuracy and showed its largest relative hysteresis at the low end of its range.19
    • Hydraulic jacks calibrated against a reference load cell gave a curve from gauge reading to force that did not pass through zero, so the lower end of the range had to be defined.20
    • In a test cylinder, seal friction depended on the fluid pressure and the sliding speed, and was high at low speed. One seal material slid intermittently (stick-slip) over the speeds tested.21

    Laboratory safety guidance makes a related point for compressed-gas systems: generally select a gauge with a range about double the working pressure.22 We found no standard that states what share of a press’s rating a method should use, and this page does not set one.

    The gauge guide explains accuracy classes and how to check a press against a reference load cell.

    4.  When does the exact pressure matter?

    Where a property changes steeply with pressure, a coarse step or an error at the low end shows in the result. Where it is flat, the same step or error matters less.

    • Steep: tablet capping went from none to all tablets within less than 50 MPa in a study of tablet geometries.23 Without precompression, the in-die elastic recovery of celecoxib rose from about 4 % at 150 MPa to about 14 % at 200 MPa. With a precompression step, which removes entrapped air, the jump did not appear.24 A sulfide electrolyte reached 92.2 % relative density at 125 MPa and 97.8 % at 250 MPa.25
    • Flat: zircon green density rose only from 55.5 to 59.6 % of the powder density between 45 and 180 MPa.5 In an XRF study, pellets pressed at loads from 4 to 40 t showed no clear change in line intensities; pellets pressed at low load tended to crack.26 In 3D-printed carbon-fiber/PA12 composite straps consolidated in a heated mold, the fall in porosity leveled off above about 6 MPa.11

    If your method sits on a steep part of its curve, check the readout step and the lower limit at your lowest pressure.

    5.  What grows with tonnage

    Rated force is not the only thing that changes across the range.

    ModelRatedSize, W × D × HWeightSupply
    Mini infrared press EPIM02TH2 T100 × 220 × 220 mm4.8 kgManual (hand screw)
    Two-column manual EPPM-2P022 T205 × 170 × 370 mmAbout 12 kgManual force
    Four-column manual EPPM-4P1515 T245 × 180 × 420 mmAbout 42 kgManual force
    Protective manual EPPM-PP6060 T440 × 240 × 530 mmAbout 142 kgManual force
    Automatic powder press EPPA010T10 T230 × 405 × 470 mmAbout 85 kg220 V, 400 W
    Automatic powder press EPPA100T100 T320 × 560 × 640 mmAbout 350 kg220 V, 700 W
    Large-tonnage automatic EPPPE200200 T480 × 650 × 950 mm, plus a 320 × 440 × 440 mm control boxAbout 850 kg220 V, 700 W

    Dimensions and weights as printed in the specifications (approximate weights marked “about”). Powered models run on 220 V, 50/60 Hz. On the manual models the force is generated by hand; the power of a digital gauge, where one is fitted, is not covered here.

    Two other things grow with the frame:

    • Working space. The four-column 15 T frame has a working space 80 mm wide and 150 mm high; the protective 60 T frame, 200 by 210 mm. A die wider or taller than the working space does not fit; the tool checks both if you enter the die size.
    • Guarding. The two- and four-column manual frames are open; the protective manual frames have a safety-glass guard door. The electric powder presses from 30 T up and the automatic powder presses, including the large-tonnage models, have a safety-glass door, leakage protection and an emergency stop. The 20 T electric press has leakage protection and an emergency stop but no door.

    The installation and RFQ checklist covers bench space, supply, and what the press safety standards cover and exclude.

    6.  Press sizing tool

    Enter your die bore and the lowest and highest pressure you will use. If you know the outer diameter and height of the die, add them. Choose the kind of work and of press. The tool lists every PressPro™ pellet press for powder, KBr or XRF work of the kind you choose (the hot and cold platen presses are not included), with separate results for capacity, the printed lower limit, the readout step on your die, the working space and the site data. Capacity gives your forces as a share of the rating and is a Pass or a Fail against the rating only. The readout step is a Note, or Not checked for the presses whose step is not covered here. The summary counts the models that are within the rating and the printed lower limit; the others are listed with every reason they fail.

    7.  A sizing sequence

    1. Fix the loaded area. The die bore, or the footprint of the sample or frame mold on a platen.
    2. Take the pressure range from the method. Both ends: the lowest pressure you will ever run and the highest.
    3. Convert both ends to force. Force = pressure × area ÷ 9800.
    4. Check the top end against the rating. The highest force must be within the rated force; the die has a rating of its own.
    5. Check the bottom end against the lower limit and the readout step. On a small die, a large frame may not reach down far enough, or may read in steps larger than your tolerance.
    6. Check the die against the working space, then the bench, the supply and the guarding.

    If two manual powder frames pass, the smaller one has the finer pointer-gauge step at your pressures. If no single frame covers your range, two presses may serve better than one. The press selection guide covers the choice between pellet, hot and isostatic presses.

    8.  Related guides and equipment

    9.  FAQ

    How many tons do I need for KBr pellets?

    It depends on the die. One published method used 10 tons on a 13 mm die, about 740 MPa if the tons are tonnes-force. For a 7 mm die the same pressure needs under 3 t; one study used 1.7 tons. The KBr pellet size guide compares the two.

    How many tons do I need for 40 mm XRF pellets?

    One study pressed 40 mm pellets at 100 kN, about 10 t and 80 MPa; 200 MPa on the same die needs about 26 t. Check your method’s pressure and convert.

    Is a bigger press always better?

    No. On a manual powder frame with a pointer gauge, a larger frame reads in coarser pressure steps on a small die. On the automatic powder presses from 10 to 100 T the screen reads force to 0.1 t on every model, but the larger models print a higher lower limit, which may be above the force you need. A larger frame is also heavier and larger. Size the frame to both ends of your pressure range.

    Can I use a 60-ton press for small pellets?

    It can reach the force, but on a 7 mm die one division of the 60 T frame’s pointer gauge is about 450 MPa. A digital gauge or a smaller frame reads far finer.

    What is the lowest force an automatic press can apply?

    Each automatic and electric PressPro™ uniaxial press prints its lower limit, from 0.1 t on the 10 T automatic powder press to 1 t on the 100 T automatic powder press and the large-tonnage presses. The tool above checks it for your die.

    Does a press within its rating protect the die?

    No. The die has its own rating. For steel dies, the PressPro™ die pressure chart gives normal use below 800 MPa and 800 to 1200 MPa as overload. A large press can easily go past 800 MPa on a small die.

    10.  References

    1Dent G. Preparation of samples for IR spectroscopy as KBr disks. Internet Journal of Vibrational Spectroscopy. 1996;1(1). irdg.org
    2Batalla-Falcon GA, Cieza LA, Lavin R, Valenzuela M, Morlok A, Chavan P, et al. Mid-infrared absorption spectra and mass absorption coefficients for 23 chondrites: dependence on composition and grain size. Astron Astrophys. 2025;696:A66. DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/202452540
    3Gazulla Barreda MF, Rodrigo Edo M, Orduña Cordero M, Ventura Vaquer MJ. Determination of minor and trace elements in geological materials used as raw ceramic materials. Bol Soc Esp Ceram Vidr. 2016;55(5):185–196. DOI: 10.1016/j.bsecv.2016.06.003
    4Yu ZS, Zhang Q, Li XL, Fan SZ, Pan YS, Li GH. [Determination of 23 elements in biological samples by wavelength dispersion X-ray fluorescence spectrometry with high pressure pressed powder pellet preparation]. Rock and Mineral Analysis. 2014;33(6):844–848. doaj.org
    5Bonamartini Corradi A, Leonelli C, Manfredini T, Siligardi C. Effect of forming pressure on the reactivity and microstructure of zircon powder compacts. J Mater Sci Lett. 1993;12(18):1434–1436. DOI: 10.1007/BF00591599
    6Vinnichenko M, Waetzig K, Aurich A, Baumgaertner C, Herrmann M, Ho CW, et al. Li-ion conductive Li1.3Al0.3Ti1.7(PO4)3 (LATP) solid electrolyte prepared by cold sintering process with various sintering additives. Nanomaterials. 2022;12(18):3178. DOI: 10.3390/nano12183178
    7Wünsch I, Friesen I, Puckhaber D, Schlegel T, Finke JH. Scaling tableting processes from compaction simulator to rotary presses: mind the sub-processes. Pharmaceutics. 2020;12(4):310. DOI: 10.3390/pharmaceutics12040310
    8Akande OF, Ford JL, Rowe PH, Rubinstein MH. The effects of lag-time and dwell-time on the compaction properties of 1:1 paracetamol/microcrystalline cellulose tablets prepared by pre-compression and main compression. J Pharm Pharmacol. 1998;50(1):19–28. DOI: 10.1111/j.2042-7158.1998.tb03300.x
    9Puls S, Nazmutdinova E, Kalyk F, Woolley HM, Thomsen JF, Cheng Z, et al. Benchmarking the reproducibility of all-solid-state battery cell performance. Nat Energy. 2024;9(10):1310–1320. DOI: 10.1038/s41560-024-01634-3
    10Doux JM, Nguyen H, Tan DHS, Banerjee A, Wang X, Wu EA, et al. Stack pressure considerations for room-temperature all-solid-state lithium metal batteries. Adv Energy Mater. 2020;10(1):1903253. DOI: 10.1002/aenm.201903253
    11Vidrih T, Winiger P, Triantafyllidis Z, Ott V, Terrasi GP. Investigations on the fatigue behaviour of 3D-printed continuous carbon fibre-reinforced polymer tension straps. Polymers (Basel). 2022;14(20):4258. DOI: 10.3390/polym14204258
    12ASTM International. ASTM D4703-24: Standard practice for compression molding thermoplastic materials into test specimens, plaques, or sheets. West Conshohocken (PA): ASTM International; 2024. DOI: 10.1520/D4703-24
    13International Organization for Standardization. Plastics — compression moulding of test specimens of thermoplastic materials. ISO 293:2023. 4th ed. Geneva: ISO; 2023. iso.org
    14European Committee for Standardization. Pressure gauges — part 1: Bourdon tube pressure gauges — dimensions, metrology, requirements and testing. EN 837-1:1996; adopted as BS EN 837-1:1998. bsigroup.com
    15American Society of Mechanical Engineers. Pressure gauges and gauge attachments. ASME B40.100-2022. asme.org
    16Malakhov D, Kelemenová T. Calibration of pressure gauges. Acta Mech Slovaca. 2025;29(4):28–34. DOI: 10.21496/ams.2026.001
    17EURAMET e.V. Guidelines on the uncertainty of force measurements. EURAMET Calibration Guide No. 4, version 3.0; 2022. inrim.it
    18International Organization for Standardization. Metallic materials — calibration of force-proving instruments used for the verification of uniaxial testing machines. ISO 376:2011. Geneva: ISO; 2011. iso.org
    19Gelany SA, Mahmoud GM. Evaluating metrological performance of a pressure balance utilizing a high-precision force transducer: an experimental study. Metrol Meas Syst. 2024;31(2):295–305. DOI: 10.24425/mms.2024.149699
    20Katz B, Kornhauser P, Bitas S. Calibration of hydraulic force machines: requirements, concepts, problems, solutions. In: XIX IMEKO World Congress, Fundamental and Applied Metrology; 2009 Sep 6–11; Lisbon. Paper TC3-024. imeko.org
    21Sârbu FA, Arnăuţ F, Deaconescu A, Deaconescu TT. Theoretical and experimental research concerning the friction forces developed in hydraulic cylinder coaxial sealing systems made from polymers. Polymers (Basel). 2024;16(1):157. DOI: 10.3390/polym16010157
    22National Research Council. Prudent Practices in the Laboratory: Handling and Management of Chemical Hazards. Updated version. Washington (DC): National Academies Press; 2011. Chapter 7, Working with laboratory equipment. DOI: 10.17226/12654
    23Mazel V, Garcia C, Tchoreloff P. Effect of geometrical features on the capping behavior of biconvex tablets. Int J Pharm. 2023;645:123365. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2023.123365
    24Vreeman GW, Sun CC. Air entrapment during tablet compression – diagnosis, impact on tableting performance, and mitigation strategies. Int J Pharm. 2022;615:121514. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2022.121514
    25Lee C, Han SY, Lewis JA, Shetty PP, Yeh D, Liu Y, et al. Stack pressure measurements to probe the evolution of the lithium–solid-state electrolyte interface. ACS Energy Lett. 2021;6(9):3261–3269. DOI: 10.1021/acsenergylett.1c01395
    26Zhao H, Liu Y, Ma S, Zhang Y, Zhang P, Li Q, et al. [Determination of major elements in small-weight soil and sediment samples by X-ray fluorescence spectrometry with pressed-powder pellets]. Rock and Mineral Analysis. 2025;44(2):305–315. DOI: 10.15898/j.ykcs.202403040030
    Disclaimer: ACS Material LLC believes that the information in this guide is accurate and represents the best and most current information available to us. The pressures quoted are those of the publications cited, given to show their range; they are not recommendations for any material. Machine data are as printed in the PressPro™ specifications. ACS Material makes no representations or warranties, either express or implied, regarding the suitability of any PressPro™ press or die for any particular purpose or the accuracy of the information listed here. Keep the sample pressure within the rating of the die in use.